THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF ENGAGEMENT CASE LAW IN PAKISTAN

The Basic Principles Of engagement case law in pakistan

The Basic Principles Of engagement case law in pakistan

Blog Article

9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair to your offender and the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court as well as from other courts but they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The a lot of this power casts an obligation to the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution may be justified when the basic norm underlying a Constitution disappears plus a new system is put in its place.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the realized counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard on the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession in the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided with the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court must see this factor for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

The loads of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested to get a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it can be made very clear that police is free to choose action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject to legislation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. In the event the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and they shall be assigned non-subject duties within the interim period. Read more

This is because transfer orders are typically viewed as within the administrative discretion of the employer. However, there might be exceptions in cases where the transfer is inspired by malice, personal vendetta, or discrimination against the employee, They might have grounds to challenge before the suitable forum. Read more

Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it calls for legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be made and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

27 . Const. P. 4002/2011 (D.B.) Ibrahim Noor V/S Pakistan International Airlines Corporation & Ors. Sindh High Court, Karachi Even, if a petitioner was acquitted inside of a criminal case following a conviction, in NAB Reference No. 20/2011, this does not automatically result in exoneration from departmental charges based over the same factual grounds. Though a writ under Article 199 is offered in specific limited situations, it is generally not the suitable remedy to contest a dismissal from service based on these charges, particularly when the employee was afforded a full opportunity to cross-examine witnesses and present his/her defense but didn't convince the department of his/her innocence.

Because of this, simply citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling anyone to tell them you’ve found their dropped phone, then telling them you live in these types of-and-this kind of community, without actually offering them an address. Driving around the neighborhood endeavoring to find their phone is likely for being more frustrating than it’s worth.

Only the written opinions on the Supreme Court and the Court of Appeals are routinely offered. Decisions with the decreased (trial) courts are not generally published or distributed.

five hundred,000/- (Rupees 5 hundred thousand only) Just about every as well as the same shall be stored during the police station for the effect that no harm shall be caused to your petitioners. five. In view of the above, this Constitutional Petition is disposed of Read more

For that reason, this petition is hereby disposed of from the terms stated higher than. However no harassment shall be caused click here to both party plus the case shall be decided because of the competent court of law if pending. Read more

Any court may perhaps look for to distinguish the present case from that of a binding precedent, to achieve a different summary. The validity of this type of distinction might or might not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to a higher court.

If that judgment goes to appeal, the appellate court will have the chance to review both the precedent and the case under appeal, Potentially overruling the previous case law by setting a brand new precedent of higher authority. This might take place several times since the case works its way through successive appeals. Lord Denning, first on the High Court of Justice, later on the Court of Appeal, provided a famous example of this evolutionary process in his advancement in the concept of estoppel starting within the High Trees case.

Therefore, this petition is found to generally be not maintainable and is also dismissed along with the pending application(s), as well as petitioners may possibly look for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Report this page